Hyltonconsiders University potential measures for quantities of punitive damages; shouldpunitive damages aim exam deter up examination University applicable level by internalisingcosts, or should they target examination eliminate University offenders expectation of gain?Hylton refers exam theinternalisation method followed by Polinsky and Shavel. He disagrees with their suggested that thecourt divide University victims loss by University chance of liability and proposes:1. if University offenders gain isgreater than University victims loss, University punitive award should aim examination internaliselosses2. if University offenders gain isless than University victims loss, University punitive award should aim examination eliminate theprospect of gain on University a part of University defendantHylton shows that University goal ofpunishment will be complete deterrence. In University BMW,for instance, BMWs refusal examination divulge damage examination University finishes of new carsresulted in University move of money from clients exam BMW. According examination Hylton,punitive damages in such cases should aim exam get rid of University defendants prospectof gain.
About the Author
